Google, the popular Internet search site, won "brand of the year" accolades in 2002, beating out Apple, Coca-Cola, Starbucks, Nike and every other brand. The brands were rated "based on the impact they had on readers lives."
Google, the popular Internet search
site, won "brand of the year" accolades in 2002, beating out Apple, Coca-Cola,
Starbucks, Nike and every other brand. The brands were rated "based on the
impact they had on readers lives."
This award points out a couple of
interesting facts. While the well-established brands like Coke and Nike have
long been known as the kings of branding, when it comes to creating mindshare on
the Web, it is a different kingdom entirely. Where in the past companies would
rely on advertising dollars and celebrities to make a splash, companies are
often able to create a brand identity on the Web primarily on the basis of
word-of-mouth. The success of Google&singlequot;s brand also points to another key factor
when it comes to Web-based branding--usefulness matters. Google would not have
rated so high if users weren&singlequot;t happy with the way that the site&singlequot;s Internet
search functionality worked. Offline branding relies on an image--colors,
sounds, looks, images, impressions. Online, usefulness reigns.
BrandChannel.com asked readers to rate
brands on the impact they had on their lives in 2002. Out of 1,315 respondents,
Google received 15% of the vote, besting Apple&singlequot;s 14%, Coca-Cola&singlequot;s 12%,
Starbucks&singlequot; 11% and Nike&singlequot;s 10%.