WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two consumer groups asked the Federal Trade
Commission on Tuesday to create a "do not track list" that would allow
computer users to bar advertisers from collecting information about
them.
The Consumer Federation of America and the Consumers Union also
urged the FTC to bar collection of health information and other
sensitive data by companies that do business on the Internet unless a
consumer consents.
The call echoed those of other privacy advocates who filed
statements with the FTC on Internet companies' use of "behavioral
advertising." That is the practice of tracking a computer user's
activities online, including Web searches and sites visited, to target
advertisements to the individual consumer.
In December, the FTC approved Google's purchase of advertising rival DoubleClick over the objections of some privacy groups.
At the same time, the agency urged advertisers to let computer users
bar advertisers from collecting information on them, to provide
"reasonable security" for any data and to collect data on health
conditions or other sensitive issues only with the consumer's express
consent.
In comments to the FTC on online behavioral advertising, advertisers
made clear a strong preference for self-regulation rather than
government dictates on how personal data are collected, what
disclosures are made to computer users and how long the information is
stored.
Consumer groups said on Tuesday they were skeptical of self-regulation.
"Self-policing schemes are not enough to protect consumers' privacy
and offer no enforcement against improper behavior," said Chris Murray,
senior counsel for Consumers Union, in a statement.
"While companies like Google are trying to put pretty good practices
in place, we don't want to rely on the good graces of the companies
because they might change their minds," he told Reuters in a telephone
interview.
Several child advocacy groups, including the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and American Academy of Pediatrics,
urged the FTC to bar advertisers from collecting information on or
advertising to anyone under the age of 18.
Several advertisers also questioned whether the FTC and privacy
groups had established that any harm had been done by the data
collected and pointed out that the advertisers subsidized the free
information often sought on the Internet.
"The associations (of businesses and advertisers) strongly believe
that self-regulation and leading business practices comprise the most
effective framework to protect consumers and further innovation in the
area of privacy and behavioral advertising," the American Advertising
Federation, Association of National Advertisers and other organizations
said in a statement.
"We believe that any additional principles or guidelines should be
issued only after the commission specifically identifies harms and
concerns so that business is in a position to consider and address
them," the group said in its comments to the FTC.
(Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by Gary Hill)
Copyright Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users
may download and print extracts of content from this website for their
own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or
redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar
means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of
Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks
or trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.