U.S. government officials have urged the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann, to go slow following its decision to relax rules on domain names such as .com or .edu. Federal officials are concerned that changes will act as a drag on the economy or add to online security risks.WASHINGTON (Reuters)—The U.S. government urged Internet standard-setters to
move slowly on a proposal to relax rules on domain names such as .com or .edu,
over concerns about economic costs and security.
The nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann,
earlier this year voted to relax the rules on so-called top-level domain names,
or TLDs, the suffixes, such as the ubiquitous .com, .net and .org, among
others.
Easing the rules could pave the way for companies or individuals to create an
array of new addresses for the Web, but the U.S. government said Icann must
ensure that introduction of a slew of new names "will not jeopardize the
stability and security" of the Internet domain name system.
"It is unclear that the threshold question of whether the potential consumer
benefits outweigh the potential costs has been adequately addressed," the U.S.
Department of Commerce, said in a letter to Icann dated Dec. 18.
Currently, there are more than 200 TLDs, which also include the two-character
country codes used by Web sites, such as Britain's .uk.
Under the proposed system, individuals, companies or groups could apply to
have any string of letters established as a domain name. It could be a vanity
name, for example -- .smith -- or a category name like .sports or
.perfume.
A company could also change its domain to reflect its brand, so Apple.com
could become Apple.mac, for instance.
VeriSign Inc now owns the registry for .com and net domain names.
For a company to become such a registry, it would need to apply to Icann,
which coordinates the Internet's naming system, at a fee expected to cost more
than $100,000.
The U.S. said Icann needs to prove it can handle a potentially huge influx of
applications and how it will police issues related to intellectual property
rights.
(By Kim Dixon, Editing by Andre Grenon)
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download
and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and
non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters
content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are
registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies
around the world. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial
Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant
interests.