IBM Printing Systems’ director of strategy discusses the current state of the printing market and how he sees smart companies positioning themselves for the future.
PrintingIQ’s Champions of Print series profiles the
knowledge leaders in the print industry, those individuals who continually work
to push software, hardware, standards and the industry in general to the next
level. The first installment in the series features Rich Howarth, director of
strategy at
IBM Printing Systems
.
Howarth took some time recently
to discuss the current state of the printing market, the importance of standards
such as PPML and JDF, and how he sees savvy printing companies positioning
themselves for the future.
PrintingIQ: Can you give us
some background on IBM Printing Systems?
Rich Howarth:
Historically, IBM has focused on
high-end production printing solutions for data centers and commercial printers
and service bureaus, as well as industrial solutions. Over the last six or seven
years, we’ve also entered the office environment with a range of workgroup
printers and multifunction products, so we have a very broad product line top to
bottom, monochrome and color.
Our focus in terms of adding value and
helping customers tends to be on the software and integration side, as well as
on the hardware side. We are viewed as the leader in terms of building
production, workflow management solutions for high-end digital printing. We have
a wide range of printing software solutions that fit in to each of the
environments we address, the industrial environment, the office environment and
the production environment. And we continue to add value and help customers
improve their productivity, reduce their labor requirements and fundamentally
lower their costs of producing documents in each of those segments through our
software and integration services.
Our solutions really help customers
capture all of their electronic data, store it, print it when necessary, and
distribute it electronically where that makes sense, for example, in
business-to-business scenarios, things like giving customers access to bills and
statements online.
It’s critical that you
are able to add value to your customer’s business – either through lower
cost, shorter turnaround time or providing more service. It will be
critical to differentiate yourself in order to avoid getting
commoditized." --Rich Howarth, IBM Printing
Systems |
PrintingIQ: I understand that
you are on the board of directors at PODI. Could you explain what
PODI is and does and why it’s important to the print
industry?
RH: PODI
comprises more than 100 companies now, including the major printer
manufacturers. The board of directors is IBM, Xerox, EFI, Adobe, NexPress,
Pitney Bowes and HP. Most of the other printing companies, including Oce, Canon
and Ricoh, are advisory board members, and most of the software vendors, from
Exstream to Document Sciences, are members also.
What we’re trying to do with PODI is
create an industry standard for variable one-to-one publishing. In the past,
each vendor has had their own proprietary solution for doing variable data color
printing. Variable data color printing is very CPU-intensive and has been
difficult to do. It’s not just creating a PostScript data stream. If you really
want to go and create 1,000 marketing brochures customized for 1,000 different
customers, that’s a very difficult thing to do with standard PostScript and it
won’t print very efficiently. So you either need to use a vendor-proprietary
approach or something like what we’re creating at PODI in PPML.
PPML (for Personalized Print Markup
Language) is an industry standard that allow you to perform such customization
across multiple applications and hardware vendor systems, and that’s obviously
preferable to the proprietary approach.
PrintingIQ: Where does the JDF
standard come into play here?
RH: PPML
is a data stream for describing variable data, whereas JDF works with any data
stream, be it PostScript, PDF, AFP, PPML or meta code. JDF describes a whole set
of attributes and parameters to allow components of a digital printing or
publishing solution to interoperate with one another. So it would allow prepress
software to interoperate with a print server to interoperate with a press. The
idea is that all of the various pieces in a digital print or press environment,
eventually, hopefully, will be able to interoperate through
JDF.
One of the things in JDF is an
industry-standard job ticket. It sounds like a simple thing, but a job ticket
contains all of the attributes that describe how you want a job printed -- how
you want it imposed, for example, what kind of paper you want it printed on and
what size. All of those things are typically described in vendor-specific ways
today. The JDF job ticket, which IBM has been very proactive in driving with
JDF, will standardize the way you describe the document.
PrintingIQ: Where do you see
the print industry evolving, especially as electronic forms of communications
come increasingly into the fore?
RH: The
printing industry has evolved substantially over the last five to seven years.
There was a lot of growth, change and turmoil, as we all know. And it’s been
driven by a number of factors. Certainly, the economy has been a major
contributor. But there is still page growth. IBM estimates that more than 3
trillion pages were printed in 2003 digitally. That market is still a good
market and will continue to grow, but I think it will be somewhat different than
in the past.
For example, it will be more focused on
using print where it makes sense, as opposed to being the only technology for
some things. What we see happening is that most companies will have multiple
channels for delivering information. There will be a right channel, and a
secondary channel, and maybe even a tertiary channel. Print will no longer be
the only – or best -- channel.
A good example is stock charts in the
back of a newspaper. Twenty years ago, that was the only way to deliver that
information. Well now, they may still print them in a newspaper, it doesn’t cost
a lot, but it’s a really poor delivery mechanism. People can get a stock quote
on their cell phone now, up to the minute. So that’s an example of something for
which paper is not particularly well-suited.
There are other things, like general
newspapers and magazines, that we believe will always remain printed as well as
being available over the Web. For example, you can read a printed copy of the
Wall St. Journal or the New York Times far faster than you can read it online.
And if you’re sitting and waiting for your airplane, or taking off, you can read
a magazine or a newspaper. You can’t read an electronic document in the same
way. So that’s an example of something I think will be offered in multiple
mediums forever probably.
PrintingIQ: Where do you see
direct mail vs. e-mail marketing heading? Isn’t this an area where printing
companies are getting squeezed out?
RH:
Actually, we see a lot of customers expressing resistance to e-mail marketing,
and part of it is as a result of the spam that we see out there today. But there
is a much smaller number of consumers who are resistant to getting unsolicited
direct mail pieces. If someone is going to send you something in the mail, you
tend to take them more seriously because you know that costs them a couple of
dollars, vs. e-mail, which you know is free and they’re just broadcasting it out
to millions of people at a time.
There is possible legislation that
could occur to make it more difficult to mass-market via e-mail. And there are
changes occurring in a lot of the browsers in online systems so that you’re not
going to even be able to receive an e-mail message with embedded images unless
the sender is in your address book, for example. The latest version of AOL is
doing that now.
So a lot of companies are asking us how
to continue marketing to consumers to maintain and enhance the relationship and
cross-sell services that customers might be interested in. For a while, people
were becoming more negative on printed direct mail and direct marketing
campaigns, but now there is a lot more interest building. And we see that as a
key future market for the digital printing industry.
PrintingIQ: And that’s where
things like PPML become more important?
RH: Well,
the more you can personalize the communications, the more effective they are and
the more likely you’ll get a response from who you’re sending it to. You cannot
do that on an offset press.
This isn’t a new idea. It’s been out
there since the mid-‘90s, when all of the digital presses started appearing. But
it’s a lot more practical now, since companies have invested a lot more in
customer relationship management solutions and really keeping information on
their customers. So we believe that will be an important growth area for the
future.
PrintingIQ: So
where does this leave today’s printing companies?
RH: For
commercial printers and the printing industry in general, I think that just like
the IT industry and other industries, it will continue to be a challenging
business. It’s critical that you are able to add value to your customer’s
business – either through lower cost, shorter turnaround time, providing more
service, something like that. It will be critical to differentiate yourself in
order to avoid getting commoditized.
Again, variable data, last minute
changes, customization and personalization are all ways commercial printers and
service bureaus can become closer to their customers and differentiate
themselves.
PrintingIQ: Isn’t that a big
challenge for a lot of printers today?
RH: For a
lot of printers, it’s a tremendous challenge. It’s much more than producing a
product. Many commercial printers have had a tendency to try to standardize on
things, focusing on reducing the amount of prepress and upfront work associated
with a job, and being able to get it on a press and out as quickly as possible
to improve profitability.
That kind of process becomes a
commodity fairly quickly. Everyone does the same thing, so everyone can shop
around a job and find the lowest cost.
But if you can add something beyond
that, customization or being able to respond at the last minute because you have
an EDI link to your customer’s systems or something like that, that gives your
customer a reason to continue doing business with you.
This requires more IT capabilities in
commercial printers. The ones that are predominantly offset today, I think are
faced with a difficult transition, whereas a lot of commercial printers that are
on the leading edge with digital technology and document management solutions
are positioned very well to go after this new market.